<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Thrifty Geek &#187; Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethriftygeek.com/new404.php/category/high-tech-low-tech-or-no-tech/future/feed/?404;http://thethriftygeek.com:80/category/high-tech-low-tech-or-no-tech/future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethriftygeek.com</link>
	<description>Tech toys and gadgets for a tough economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Holgraphic TV? Looks good, but you can&#8217;t have it&#8230; yet.</title>
		<link>http://thethriftygeek.com/2008/11/holgraphic-tv-looks-good-but-you-cant-have-it-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://thethriftygeek.com/2008/11/holgraphic-tv-looks-good-but-you-cant-have-it-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethriftygeek.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  
CNN made quite a splash tonight with their &#8220;holographic&#8221; interview of Jessica Yellin by Wolf Blitzer. But is it real?
Not quite. Yes, CNN was capturing 3D information at the interview site by surrounding Yellin by 35 high def cameras. But despite what you saw on the screen, Wolf Blitzer was not actually seeing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> Normal   0         false   false   false                             MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><span class="mceItemObject"   classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></span> <mce:style><!  st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } --> <!--[endif]--><!--  --><!--[if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0in; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-ansi-language:#0400; 	mso-fareast-language:#0400; 	mso-bidi-language:#0400;} --> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p>CNN made quite a splash tonight with their &#8220;holographic&#8221; interview of Jessica Yellin by Wolf Blitzer. But is it real?</p>
<div id="attachment_34" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 360px"><img class="size-full wp-image-34" title="cnnhologram" src="http://thethriftygeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/cnnhologram.jpg" alt="Wolf Blitzer interviews a hologram of Jessica Yellin" width="350" height="197" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Wolf Blitzer interviews a hologram of Jessica Yellin</p></div>
<p>Not quite. Yes, CNN was capturing 3D information at the interview site by surrounding Yellin by 35 high def cameras. But despite what you saw on the screen, Wolf Blitzer was not actually seeing her in the studio. He was seeing her on a screen (just as we were), much as a weather reporter sees a projection on a green screen. In exactly the same way, Yellin&#8217;s 3D image was fed into the cameras video stream. The trick &#8211; the position of the camera was being tracked so that as it moved, the incoming video was changed based on the position of the camera and the 3D data.</p>
<p>So what you&#8217;re really seeing is a green screen effect. A really cool one, but it&#8217;s not a real holographic projection in the studio. At least not yet.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry though &#8211; true 3D holographic TV is coming. Recent work at the University  of Arizona has led to the development of holographic media that can be rewritten. Right now it takes several minutes to rewrite a holographic image &#8211; a long way from the 30 frames per second you&#8217;d want for a TV image. But will you one day have a flat screen true holographic TV? It seems increasingly likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thethriftygeek.com/2008/11/holgraphic-tv-looks-good-but-you-cant-have-it-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.462 seconds -->
